The Google Father
In the video Andreas Ekstrom asked people why they used
Google as a search engine. People answered because it works, they didn’t know
of any other alternatives, and lastly because it provided unbiased search results. Well If Mr. Ekstrom would have asked me the
same question I probably would have answered the same. I don’t think there can be any unbiased searches
in today’s world. There are simply too many variables that one must go through to
get a truly unbiased answer from a search engine. You must be specific in what
the subject is being searched and multiple search platforms should be used.
I use google because It has worked for many years and I have
never needed to change my search engine. As of right now google is the top
search engine used, followed by Bing, and then Yahoo. We always here the term just “google it”, it’s
a catchy phrase. You don’t hear people say, “Bing it” or just “Yahoo it” it doesn’t
sound the same. Almost everything that is popular today is by word of mouth. Even
Professors, Teachers, and Colleagues from work advise us to use google as a tool. But
they do not tell us that we must be specific in what we search.
As far as being unbiased, google finds what we type in the
search bar and it has many resources from where it gets the information. If something else comes up that is not what we are looking for then
we must be more specific on what we are searching for. Google has the power to
manipulate whatever search pops up after we hit the search button. In the
examples that Mr. Andreas Ekstrom used I tried to search Michelle Obama
pictures with the image of the monkey. I could not find one if I just typed
Michelle Obama. I had to type Michelle Obama meme and whoa did I get a lot of unfavorable
images. I also googled Anders Behring Breivik and did not come up with dog poop
on a side walk. Maybe Google manually erased the images like they did for
Michelle Obama since it’s been almost six years. I can understand why they
would be outraged when this attack happened to the then First Lady of the
United States of America. It was very wrong for what they did, Google was
protecting the dignity and image of the First Lady.
Now why did they not do that For Anders? Was it because they
were afraid of backlash for correcting the face of a monster that just murdered
innocent men, women, and children? Who knows but it is certain that google has
the power to manipulate whatever the world searches through its search engine. So,
what if this happens to one of us. How do we protect ourselves from slander?
What can we do if we become victim to a cyber-attack on our image? Who do we
hold accountable for the actions of other people? The truth is we cannot, we
can only hope that will never happen to us. In today’s time we have been molded
to be politically correct, be afraid to voice our opinions and accept the unacceptable
for us not to look bad in front of our peers.
Nice response but I would make this argument.
ReplyDeleteI would argue that google has a social responsibility to BE biased. For example, should we be unbiased when it comes to NeoNazis or racists or terrorists? What gets me about Ekstrøm's argument is he seems to imply that bias is always bad and that Google has an obligation to remain unbiased.
I would argue that by NOT giving as much credibility to awful people they are being good corporate citizens. I don't really WANT Nazis to get "fair, unbiased treatment". Their very ideology is against certain people's EXISTENCE. Anyone who wants to exterminate another group of people or condone slavery, murder or rape does not deserve unbiased treatment.
However, one thing is clear, as you point out; it's important that we check multiple sources, to not just trust in the credibility of one place before we form an opinion on something. That's some that Ekstrøm points out and your support of that is very accurate.